1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 900 P.2d
  5. 900 P.2d 81 (1995)
 

GRAND JUNCTION v. UTE WATER CONSERVANCY

No. 93SC745.

900 P.2d 81 (1995)

CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. UTE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 30, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel E. Wilson, City Atty., City of Grand Junction, John P. Shaver, Asst. City Atty., Grand Junction, Grimshaw & Harring, P.C., Wayne B. Schroeder, Ronald L. Fano, Peter J. Whitmore, Denver, for petitioner/cross-respondent.

Williams, Turner & Holmes, P.C., Mark A. Hermundstad, William D. Prakken, Grand Junction, for respondent/cross-petitioner.

Geoffrey T. Wilson, Gen. Counsel, Colorado Municipal League, Denver, for amicus curiae Colorado Municipal League.

Justice LOHR delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The issues in this case arise out of a dispute between the Ute Water Conservancy District (District) and the City of Grand Junction (City) as to which entity has the authority to provide water to domestic water users in areas where the boundaries of the City and the District overlap. The primary issue in this case is whether a bond—originally issued by the District to the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases