Defendant was convicted of sexually abusing two young girls and of raping the oldest, who was 12 years of age at the time. He maintains that the rape conviction must be reversed because there was no evidence that penetration was actually accomplished (see, Penal Law § 130.00 [1]; People v Dunn,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.