PATELL INDUS. MACH. v. TOYODA MACHINERY U.S.A.

Civ. No. 93-CV-1572.

880 F.Supp. 96 (1995)

PATELL INDUSTRIAL MACHINE CO., INC., Plaintiff v. TOYODA MACHINERY U.S.A., INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

March 30, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock Blaine & Huber, Rochester, NY, for plaintiff (Gregory M. Trusso, of counsel).

Martin, Martin & Woodard, Syracuse, NY, for defendant (Winthrop H. Thurlow, of counsel).


DECISION AND ORDER

SCULLIN, District Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Presently before the court is defendant Toyoda Machinery U.S.A., Inc.'s ("Toyoda") motion for partial summary judgment as to three of the four causes of action brought in the complaint. Toyoda seeks to dismiss plaintiff Patell Industrial Machine Co., Inc.'s ("Patell") causes of action alleging breach of warranty, fraudulent inducement, and negligent misrepresentation.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases