1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 38 Cal.App.4th
  5. 38 Cal.App.4th 59 (1995)
 

ROMITO v. RED PLASTIC CO.

Docket No. B082569.

38 Cal.App.4th 59 (1995)

44 Cal. Rptr.2d 834

ANITA L. ROMITO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RED PLASTIC COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

September 7, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stolpman, Krissman, Elber, Mandel & Katzman and Lynne E. Rasmussen for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, T. Emmet Thornton and Karen L. Schwartz for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

ORTEGA, Acting P.J.

If the technological means exist, must a manufacturer improve its product to guard against injuries resulting from unforeseeable and accidental product misuse in order to stave off potential tort liability? We conclude as a matter of policy that despite the means to build a safer product, a manufacturer owes no duty to prevent injuries resulting from unforeseeable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases