ORDER OF CENSURE.
The matter came before the Judicial Standards Commission arising out of allegations of misconduct against the respondent. The subject matter of the allegations was based on certain comments made during the trial of two separate cases by respondent while serving as the presiding judge.
Respondent stipulated to the correctness of the factual bases of the allegations and further stipulated that the described conduct would be prejudicial to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
