1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 888 P.2d
  5. 888 P.2d 79 (1995)
 

REEVES v. YAMHILL COUNTY

LUBA No. 94-105; CA A86197.

888 P.2d 79 (1995)

132 Or.App. 263

Daniel REEVES, Petitioner, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, Philip Lisac and Norma Lisac, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 4, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Cox, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Richard H. Allan, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Philip Lisac and Norma Lisac. With him on the brief was Ball, Janik & Novack.

No appearance for respondent Yamhill County.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner appealed to LUBA from Yamhill County's approval of respondent Lisacs' (respondents) application to build a non-resource dwelling in a low density residential zone, which is subject to a Willamette River Greenway (WRG) overlay district. LUBA remanded the decision, but rejected petitioner's contention that the county wrongly interpreted section 902.06.E. of its zoning ordinance (YCZO) as being consistent with granting a permit for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases