COM. v. STIPETICH


539 Pa. 428 (1995)

652 A.2d 1294

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. George STIPETICH, Appellee (No. 57). COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Heidi STIPETICH, Appellee (No. 58).

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 23, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Colville, Dist. Atty., Edward Marcus Clark, Maria V. Copetas, and Michael W. Streily, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellant.

William F. Manifesto, Manifesto & Donahoe and Ellen M. Viakley, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This is an appeal by allowance from an order of the Superior Court which affirmed the orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County dismissing criminal complaints charging the appellees, George and Heidi Stipetich, with possession of controlled substances. At issue is the validity of a non-prosecution agreement entered by the Stipetiches and police officers of the City of Pittsburgh.

In November...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases