Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in precluding the defense counsel from cross-examining the plaintiff about an unrelated action in which she sought to recover damages for different injuries than those for which she sought to recover damages in the instant action (see, Feldsberg v Nitschke,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.