Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating disciplinary rules prohibiting the refusal of a direct order, verbal interference with an employee, the refusal of staff directions relating to movement and the misuse of State property as the result of an incident in which he was uncooperative with correction officers who were attempting to escort him to recreation. We reject petitioner's argument that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
