1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 279 N.J.
  5. 279 N.J. Super. 672 (1995)
 

DUFFY v. O'CONNELL

279 N.J. Super. 672 (1995)

653 A.2d 1200

ELETHA DUFFY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ANITA O'CONNELL AND DONALD VANARELLI, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 28, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy P. McKeown argued the cause for appellant (Schachter, Trombadore, Offen, Stanton & Pavics, attorneys; Mr. McKeown, on the brief).

Daniel Kaplinsky argued the cause for respondent Anita O'Connell (Martin & Simmonds, attorneys; Christina F. Blunda, on the brief).

Luke A. Petrocelli argued the cause for respondent Donald Vanarelli (Offices of Edward P. Papalia, Jr., attorneys; Cindy L. Thompson, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY, ARNOLD M. STEIN and PAUL G. LEVY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PAUL G. LEVY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff sought non-economic damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. After discovery was complete, defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff failed to meet the "verbal threshold" of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a. The motion was granted. On appeal plaintiff contends the motion judge failed to consider her qualification under the ninth

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases