Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant argues that the Family Court determination that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree, was against the weight of the evidence. However, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see, CPL 470.15 [5]), we find that the weight of the evidence adduced at the hearing
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.