1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 215 A.D.2d
  5. 215 A.D.2d 723 (1995)
 

FLOWERS v. SOUTHAMPTON HOSP.

215 A.D.2d 723 (1995)

627 N.Y.S.2d 81

Mary A. Flowers et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Southampton Hospital, Defendant, and Martin J. Van Dyne, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 30, 1995

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the contention of the defendant doctor, there was sufficient evidence from which a jury could rationally conclude that he departed from good and accepted medical practice by failing to properly read a January 1987 mammogram and by failing to identify a suspicious lesion. These failures precluded the plaintiff Mary Flowers from opting for a lumpectomy with radiation therapy when the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases