STATE EX REL. LIPINSKI v. CUYAHOGA CTY. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PROBATE DIV.

No. 95-896.

74 Ohio St.3d 19 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. LIPINSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, PROBATE DIVISION, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 1, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles C. Redmond, for appellants.

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carol Shockley, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

Appellants assert in their first proposition of law that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ of prohibition because the dismissal of the previous common pleas court action barred Ingle's subsequent declaratory judgment action in probate court based on res judicata.

In order to be entitled to a writ of prohibition, appellants must establish (1) that the probate court and Judge Corrigan are about to exercise judicial or quasijudicial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases