HOAGLAND v. STATE

No. C3-95-563.

539 N.W.2d 392 (1995)

Leland M. HOAGLAND, petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

November 2, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Nyvold, Special Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, for Appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Minnesota Attorney General, St. Paul, Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Beverly J. Wolfe, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2, 1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases