1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 53 F.3d
  5. 53 F.3d 874 (1995)
 

U.S. v. SINDEL

Nos. 94-2683, 94-2684.

53 F.3d 874 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America; Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard H. SINDEL; Sindel & Sindel, PC; Defendants-Appellants. John Doe; Jane Doe; Intervenors. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Amici Curiae.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided: April 28, 1995.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Atwell, Kansas City, MO, argued (Ronald D. Lee and Cheryl A. Pilate, on the brief), for appellant.

John A. Dudeck, Jr., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, argued (Gary R. Allen and Charles E. Brookhart, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Attorney Richard Sindel of Sindel & Sindel, P.C., appeals a district court order requiring him to disclose information about two clients, intervenors John Doe and Jane Doe, on Internal Revenue Service Form 8300. These forms, which are used to report cash transactions in excess of $10,000 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, request the name, address, tax identification number, and other information about each payor and each...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases