Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.
The defendant argues on appeal that he was entitled to have his Mapp hearing reopened. However, in the absence of additional pertinent facts indicating that the evidence admitted at the trial was the product of an illegal arrest (see, CPL 710.40 [4]), the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's application to reopen the Mapp hearing.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.