U.S. v. HOLDEN

No. 94-8150 Non-Argument Calendar.

61 F.3d 858 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Leslie HOLDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

August 21, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher A. Townley, Rossville, GA, for appellant.

Carl Leslie Holden, Doraville, GA, pro se.

Thomas A. Devlin, Jr., Amy Levin Weil, Asst. U.S. Attys., Russell Vineyard, Atlanta, GA, for appellee.

Before BIRCH, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

I. Introduction

Carl Leslie Holden pleaded guilty to possession of a destructive device — a Claymore anti-personnel mine — in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). He now appeals the sentence resulting from that guilty plea. Having considered the several issues that Holden raises on appeal, we find that none presents grounds for a reversal. In this opinion, we specifically address only a few of those issues.1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases