Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant sought to demonstrate to the jury that he had noticeable, gold front teeth at the time of the robbery, and that the robbery victim's failure to note the gold teeth undermined the victim's identification of the defendant. The defendant declined to testify, but the court allowed him to exhibit his teeth to the jury without having to undergo any questioning. The court, however, would not allow the defendant
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
