Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was convicted of the gunpoint robbery of two persons. On appeal, he argues that the People were erroneously permitted to impeach one of their own witnesses with a prior signed written statement in violation of CPL 60.35 (1). He further argues that the error was compounded when the court failed to give limiting instructions to the jury concerning the evidentiary value of the statement. We disagree.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.