Ordered that the order dated May 2, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated May 10, 1994, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in reviewing the requested document in camera and in subsequently denying the plaintiffs' motion to compel the production of the document (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.