1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 904 F.Supp.
  5. 904 F.Supp. 3 (1995)
 

AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. v. FRY

Civ. A. No. 93-2163 (RCL).

904 F.Supp. 3 (1995)

AMOCO PRODUCTION CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Thomas A. FRY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 12, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. Poe Leggette, Jackson & Kelly, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs.

Michael Reed, U.S. Department of Justice, Environmental & Natural Resources Div., General Litigation Section, Washington, DC, for defendants.

Lisa K. Hemmer, Trial Attorney on Behalf of U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the parties' submissions and the relevant law, for the reasons set forth below, the court will grant defendants' motion for summary judgment, and deny plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.

I.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs in this case are oil companies1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases