Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied the branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress testimony concerning the identification of the defendant at the lineup. It is well settled that there is no requirement "that a defendant in a lineup be surrounded by people nearly identical [to him] in appearance" (People v Chipp,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.