Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court improperly allowed testimony concerning the contents of certain police radio transmissions in which he was described. However, the court properly permitted such testimony to explain the presence of police officers at the scene and to avoid speculation by the jury (see, People v Burrus,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.