1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 66 F.3d
  5. 66 F.3d 830 (1995)
 

U.S. v. YOUNG

No. 95-1097.

66 F.3d 830 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 14, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donna Eide (submitted), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff-appellee.

Thomas M. Dawson, Leavenworth, KS, for defendant-appellant.

Before CUMMINGS and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and CRABB, District Judge.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us for the third time. Mark Young's principal contention is that our remand order following the second appeal was limited in scope. He submits that our order permitted the district court to revisit only its calculation of the quantity of marijuana attributable to him. Therefore, he contends, the district court exceeded its authority when it ordered an upward departure on resentencing. For the reasons that follow, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases