SHETKA v. AITKIN COUNTY

No. C1-95-1355.

541 N.W.2d 349 (1995)

George SHETKA, Appellant, v. AITKIN COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 27, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy R. Thornton, Jack Y. Perry, Briggs and Morgan, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Bradley C. Rhodes, Aitkin County Attorney, Aitkin, for respondent.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and KLAPHAKE and WILLIS, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

As directed by the Aitkin County Shore-land Management Ordinance, appellant George Shetka sought review of the Aitkin County planning commission's denial of his conditional use permit application first by the county board and then by the district court. The district court dismissed Shetka's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, stating that a writ of certiorari was the only available method to obtain judicial review pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases