1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 46 F.3d
  5. 46 F.3d 842 (1995)
 

NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE TRADING v. PIONEER TRADING CO.

No. 94-2868.

46 F.3d 842 (1995)

NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE TRADING CORPORATION OF CHINA, Appellant, v. PIONEER TRADING COMPANY, INC.; American Chrome Company, Inc., Defendants, David T.C. Hou; Cathy T.S. Hou, also known as Cathy T.S. Xu, Appellees. PIONEER TRADING COMPANY, INC.; American Chrome Company, Inc., Counter-Claimant, v. NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE TRADING CORPORATION OF CHINA, Counter-Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided February 2, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Darling, Minneapolis, MN, argued (Charles Maier, on the brief), for appellant.

Brent I. Clark, Chicago, IL, argued (Kevin Narko, Chicago, IL, Rand S. Wonio, Davenport, IA, on the brief), for appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge, HEANEY and BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the district court1 committed reversible error by employing an improper jury instruction.

Pioneer Trading Company, Inc. (Pioneer) and American Chrome Company (American Chrome) entered into a business transaction with National Automotive Trading Corporation of China (NATC) and China National Automotive Industry Import & Export Corporation (CAIEC). The business relationship...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases