1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 222 A.D.2d
  5. 222 A.D.2d 666 (1995)
 

SIMPSON v. KAO

222 A.D.2d 666 (1995)

636 N.Y.S.2d 70

Abby R. Simpson, Respondent, v. Chien Yuan Kao et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 29, 1995

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The proof that the defendants planted and cultivated a few trees on the plaintiff's property near the boundary line between their property and the plaintiff's property is insufficient to establish adverse possession by usually cultivating or improving the property in dispute (see, RPAPL 522 [1]; Van Valkenburgh v Lutz,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases