1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 222 A.D.2d
  5. 222 A.D.2d 661 (1995)
 

LOVE v. PERALES

222 A.D.2d 661 (1995)

636 N.Y.S.2d 93

Maxine Love et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cesar Perales et al., Respondents, and Andrew P. O'Rourke, as County Executive of The County of Westchester, et al., Intervenors-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 29, 1995

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants sought to intervene in this action as plaintiffs on the ground that they had a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the case.

In Matter of O'Rourke v Perales (193 A.D.2d 802), we dismissed the appellants' hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action which raised the same issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases