Plaintiff commenced this action for money damages against defendant and defendant subsequently defaulted in the action. Supreme Court thereafter granted defendant's motion to vacate the default. Contrary to plaintiff's assertion, we do not find that Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting the motion. Inasmuch as defendant demonstrated that the default was attributable to its secretary's mistaken assumption, when served with process, that the papers served upon him...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
