Ordered that the order of commitment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's arguments, the record supports the Family Court's determination that he was in willful noncompliance with a prior order of support. Indeed, although he failed to make the required support payments, the appellant testified that he was earning $75,000 per year and that he was in the process of purchasing a lucrative dental practice (see, Matter of Orzechowski v Orzechowski...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
