RICE v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY

No. C-940017.

104 Ohio App.3d 776 (1995)

RICE et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County.

Decided June 21, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rice & Fiala and James K. Rice, for appellants.

Frost & Jacobs and Richard M. Goehler, for appellee.

Dinsmore & Shohl and John W. Beatty, for amici curiae Procter & Gamble Company, Kroger Company, General Electric Company, Chemed Corporation, and Eagle-Picher Industries.


PAINTER, Judge.

The plaintiffs-appellants, Ronald R. and Beverly D. Rice, appeal from the judgment of the common pleas court which affirmed the determination of the city of Montgomery Board of Tax Appeals that the Rices' exercise of a stock option given by Ronald Rice's employer is subject to municipal income taxation. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

I. Facts

Prior to 1988, Ronald Rice received...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases