Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants contend that the dismissal of the prior complaint dated July 14, 1992, for failure to prosecute the action precludes the plaintiff from invoking CPLR 205 (a), which allows a plaintiff to commence a second action based on the same transaction or occurrence as the first action within six months of the termination of the first action. Since none of the Statutes of Limitation governing the various causes of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
