1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 78 Wn.
  5. 78 Wn. App. 774 (1995)
 

STATE v. ROUSSEAU

Nos. 34494-3-I; 34624-5-I.

78 Wn. App. 774 (1995)

898 P.2d 871

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. LORENZO ROUSSEAU, Defendant, and EDWARD ONEAL PRINCE, Appellant. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. GAYLORD CECIL YOUNG, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

July 31, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Tassano and Michael Mittlestat, for appellants.

Catherine Hendricks, for respondent.

BAKER, C.J.

Edward Prince and Gaylord Young1 each argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant an exceptional sentence downward based on his minor role in the crime of delivery of a controlled substance. We hold that appellants are barred by RCW 9.94A.210(1) from appealing their standard range sentences.

FACTS

Young pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance within a school zone. He moved for an exceptional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases