1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 52 F.3d
  5. 52 F.3d 792 (1995)
 

NUNLEY v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Nos. 93-56110, 93-56166.

52 F.3d 792 (1995)

Michelle La Nette NUNLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Mann and Donald W. Cook, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

James K. Hahn, City Atty., Thomas C. Hokinson, Sr. Asst. City Atty., and Katherine J. Hamilton, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: BEEZER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge:

This appeal from a district judge's denial of an extension of time to file notice of appeal raises questions of first impression concerning the interpretation of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). Rule 4(a)(6) provides for an extension of time upon a showing that the would-be appellant did not receive notice of the entry of judgment and that no other party would be prejudiced by the extension. We hold that a specific factual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases