Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly refused to treat the defendant as a youthful offender. The defendant stood convicted of an armed felony and presented no evidence of mitigating circumstances or that he was a "minor" participant in the crime. Therefore, he was not entitled to youthful offender treatment (see, CPL 720.10 [3]).
Additionally, the defendant received the bargained-for sentences and, therefore, has no cause...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
