Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record supports the Supreme Court's conclusion that in response to the defendant's promise to invest the plaintiff's money, the plaintiff gave the defendant $40,000, which the defendant then failed to invest for her. Furthermore, the court properly awarded interest from the date the plaintiff transferred the money to the defendant to be invested on her behalf (see
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.