1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 51 F.3d
  5. 51 F.3d 780 (1995)
 

STUART HALL CO., INC. v. AMPAD CORP.

No. 94-2618.

51 F.3d 780 (1995)

STUART HALL COMPANY, INC., a Missouri corporation, Appellant, v. AMPAD CORP., a Massachusetts corporation, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided April 7, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Hoskins, Chicago, IL, argued (James A. Clark, Stuart I. Graff, and Susan L. Winger, Chicago, and Robert O. Lesley and W. Bruce Day, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellant.

Arthur F. Dionne, Windsor, CT, argued (Philmore H. Colburn, II, Windsor, CT, and Carter H. Kokjer, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MAGILL and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, District Judge.

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

Stuart Hall appeals the district court's denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction against Ampad in this trade dress action brought under Lanham Act § 43(a). Stuart Hall argues that the district court applied an unrecognized legal standard to determine whether its trade dress is inherently distinctive, and that the court failed to consider or to grant appropriate weight to the evidence presented on the other elements of the trade...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases