In this action to recover for breach of an insurance contract based upon defendant insurer's refusal to pay plaintiff's claim for $224,849.22 in damage to its inventory caused by a burst steam pipe, the jury obviously credited the testimony of plaintiff's owner and operator who, as the major eyewitness, spent by far the most time examining the damaged goods, consisting of photographic and electronic equipment. In setting aside the verdict, which awarded plaintiff the full...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
