1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 183 Ariz.
  5. 183 Ariz. 642 (1995)
 

STATE v. HERRERA

No. 1 CA-CR 94-0664-PR.

183 Ariz. 642 (1995)

905 P.2d 1377

STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Daniel Mark HERRERA, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

October 17, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terence C. Hance, Coconino County Attorney by Richard S. Vihel, Deputy County Attorney, Flagstaff, for Respondent.

Daniel Mark Herrera, Chandler, Petitioner in pro. per.

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Daniel Mark Herrera ("defendant") seeks review of the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Rule 32"). We hold that a trial court has jurisdiction under Rule 32 to determine a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Furthermore, in this case, the trial court did not err in dismissing that claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases