Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court's charge on the defense of justification was misleading because the objective portion of the charge failed to instruct the jurors that they should put themselves in his shoes and consider the circumstances as they appeared to him. This claim of error is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Noor,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.