PEOPLE v. BROWN


86 N.Y.2d 728 (1995)

655 N.E.2d 162

631 N.Y.S.2d 121

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Brown, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 29, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl E. Pflanz, New York City, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Howard A. Pincus and Rosemary Herbert for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Margaret M. DePaola and Paul Harnisch of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by remitting the case to Supreme Court, New York County, for a Wade hearing and, as so modified, affirmed. If it is determined at the Wade hearing that police suggestiveness tainted the showup identification procedure, defendant is entitled to a new trial. If the People prevail at the Wade hearing, the judgment of conviction and sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases