MATTER OF WELFARE OF D.D.G.

No. C5-94-2515.

532 N.W.2d 279 (1995)

In the Matter of the WELFARE OF D.D.G.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Charlann Winking, Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant D.D.G.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Earl E. Maus, Cass County Atty., Jon P. Eclov, Asst. Cass County Atty., Walker, for respondent County.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., TOUSSAINT, C.J., and FOLEY, J.


OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court's order requiring appellant to pay restitution, arguing that (1) restitution is not allowable where there was no damage to person(s) or property, and (2) payments from the reward fund voluntarily established to assist in the investigation of a crime are not compensable as restitution because they are not a direct result of the crime. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant D.D.G...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases