HAMILTON v. BECKER CO

Docket No. 181236.

214 Mich. App. 593 (1995)

543 N.W.2d 60

HAMILTON v. BECKER ORTHOPEDIC APPLIANCE COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 19, 1995, at 9:00 A.M.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kepes, Wine & McNeilage, P.C. (by Carol A. McNeilage and Miriam Z. Wolock), for the plaintiff.

Moffett & Dillon, P.C. (by Donald R. Dillon, Jr., and Christine M. Battle), for the defendant.

Before: SAWYER, P.J., and YOUNG and S.B. NEILSON, JJ.


YOUNG, J.

The sole issue before this Court is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant costs and attorney fees pursuant to MCR 2.405. We find that the trial court did err. Consequently, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

The history of the parties' engagement under the offer of judgment rule, MCR 2.405, is varyingly described as "hollow offers" by the plaintiff and as "mind boggling" "ping-pong"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases