Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the hearing testimony of the arresting officer on the incidents leading to the stopping of the car was incredible and therefore the seizure of physical evidence and his inculpatory statement should have been suppressed. We disagree.
Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the hearing court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.