WALLICE v. WATERPOINTE AT OAKDALE SHORES, INC.


222 A.D.2d 578 (1995)

636 N.Y.S.2d 645

John Wallice, Respondent, v. Waterpointe at Oakdale Shores, Inc., Defendant, and Fleet Bank, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 18, 1995


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In considering a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) the court must accept the plaintiff's allegations as true and must "resolve all inferences which reasonably flow therefrom in favor of the pleader" (Sanders v Winship, 57 N.Y.2d 391, 394; see also, Leon v Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases