1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 194 Wis.2d
  5. 194 Wis.2d 606 (1995)
 

HEINRITZ v. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY

No. 94-3025.

194 Wis.2d 606 (1995)

535 N.W.2d 81

Carl T. HEINRITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided May 9, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of John S. Williamson, Jr. of Appleton.

For the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Randall A. Haak and Timothy J. McCoy of McCarty, Curry, Wydeven, Peeters & Haak of Kaukauna.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.

CANE, P.J.

Carl T. Heinritz appeals the circuit court's judgment granting Lawrence University's motion to dismiss, contending that Lawrence University's agreement to hire him was enforceable because it was legally distinct from an employee at-will contract. Second, Heinritz asserts that his remedy is specific performance. Because we conclude that the employment contract was an at-will contract and the exclusive remedy to an employment discrimination suit is under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases