Respondent-appellant's counsel appeared on her behalf at the time the extension of placement was ordered by the Family Court Judge on August 5, 1994, and failed to raise any issue of timeliness in the filing of the petition by the presentment agency or of notice to appellant; nor did counsel raise any issue of lack of jurisdiction over appellant. Thus, we deem appellant to have waived any objection to the nonconformance with the statute concerning filing, notice and service...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
