KUZMICZ v. IVY HILL PARK APTS.


282 N.J. Super. 513 (1995)

660 A.2d 1208

IRENEUSZ KUZMICZ, MARIE KUZMICZ, TADEUSZ WRONOWSKI AND HANNAH WRONOWSKI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. IVY HILL PARK APARTMENTS, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. CITY OF NEWARK AND NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANTS, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 3, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Burke argued the cause for appellant Ivy Hill Park Apts. (Berlin, Kaplan, Dembling & Burke, attorneys; Mr. Burke, on the brief).

Joel C. Rinsky argued the cause for respondent Ireneusz Kuzmicz (Mr. Rinsky, on the brief).

James R. Connell argued the cause for respondent Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (Dwyer, Connell & Lisbona, attorneys; Paul J. Curreri, on the brief).

Before KING, D'ANNUNZIO and EICHEN, JJ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

Defendant, Ivy Hill Park Apartments (Ivy Hill), appeals from a money judgment in favor of plaintiff entered on a jury verdict. Ivy Hill's third-party action against the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A & P) had been disposed of prior to trial by summary judgment in favor of A & P. Summary judgment was granted in favor of the City of Newark prior to trial.

The material facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases