Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that it was reversible error to admit into evidence testimony of a witness whose identity was obtained as a result of statements made by the defendant which had been suppressed by the hearing court. We disagree. The record shows that the witness in this case, who is a codefendant in a companion case (see, People v Burnie,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
