1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 454 S.E.2d
  5. 454 S.E.2d 339 (1995)
 

PINCKNEY v. ATKINS

No. 2291.

454 S.E.2d 339 (1995)

Franklin PINCKNEY, Respondent, v. Ruth P. ATKINS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided January 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale E. Van Slambrook, of Steinberg, Spitz, Goldberg, Pearlman, Holmes, White & O'Neill, Goose Creek, for appellant.

John B. Williams, Moncks Corner, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

The pleadings denominate this action as one to remove a cloud from title.1 Ruth P. Atkins appeals the master's order granting partition, claiming that not all necessary parties were named as defendants and properly served with process, and that the master failed to value the property and the improvements to the property. We reverse and remand.

This action concerns nine acres of real estate located in Berkeley County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases